Home
Vendor
Project
  Phase I
Press
  Phase I
About
You Are Using IPv4 To Access This Site
Your IP Address is: 38.107.191.84

RE: [moonv6] Call to Action: Teredo and Tunnel Service Broker on Moonv6 Network Pilot

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view

From: Bound, Jim (jim.bound@hp.com)
Date: 04/16/04


Hi Everyone,  

Thanks for all the great mail. But please I want to see both solutions used not just one of them ok. I should have made that more clear I guess. This is not a bake off but a technical investigation and it is not to promote products but do true technical analysis of transition mechanisms.  

Josep will do, and it appears all want to play and I am quite impressed with this membership worldwide.  

Recall our motto here. We do this work for something greater than ourselves, and we are vendor neutral in our variant deliberations.  

thanks
/jim

        From: SOLE i TRESSERRES Josep / FTR&D / US [mailto:josep.soleitresserres@rd.francetelecom.com] 

	Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 6:27 PM
	To: Bound, Jim
	Cc: nav6tf@ipv6forum.com; moonv6@iol.unh.edu
	Subject: RE: [moonv6] Call to Action: Teredo and Tunnel Service
Broker on Moonv6 Network Pilot                  

        Hello,

        First of all, thanks for starting this promising initiative.

        As mentioned during the second Phase of Moonv6 hosted at UNH, France Telecom R&D is interested in these scenarios using Teredo and/or Tunnel Service Broker. In this sense, we would be more that happy to collaborate and participate in this pilot trial of Teredo and/or Tunnel Broker servers/relays in support of the Moonv6 Network Pilot.

        Please let us know what the next steps of this initiative are.

        Thanks,

        Josep 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: owner-moonv6@io.iol.unh.edu [mailto:jim.bound@hp.com] 
	Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 9:45 AM 
	To: nav6tf@ipv6forum.com; moonv6@iol.unh.edu;
members@ipv6forum.com 
	Subject: [moonv6] Call to Action: Teredo and Tunnel Service
Broker on Moonv6 Network Pilot

        moonv6 post from "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>           

        I want to call to action that we now do something aggressive to promote

        IPv6 in the home to our Moonv6 Network Pilot by us beginning to deploy

        within Moonv6 the Teredo and Tunnel Broker industry mechanisms defined

        as work in the IETF awaiting some more analysis. We cannot wait on the

        IETF process, and need to move forward. We can work in the IETF as our

        members do now to assist with that specification process. I would like

        to log into UNH from my home to a server that permits me to avoid NAT

        with IPv6 and get around my ISP until they can fully support IPv6 as one

        example from Linux or XP, which are my client OS's used for IPv6. We

        should ask our ISP participants if they would support a pilot trial of

        Teredo and/or Tunnel Broker servers/relays in support of the Moonv6

        Network Pilot.           

        This does not preclude other transition mechanisms for other purposes

        which are being deployed across the IPv6 earth each with key benefits

        too like manual tunnels, DSTM, and ISATAP. The IPv6 carpenters of the

        world will need many tools and one size does not fit all is our theme.           

        Latif, Yanick, Patrick C., and I had an excellent discussion with China

        IPv6 Council members and we will and must help China IPv6 network pilots

        to participate in Moonv6 in addition to European and others parts of the

        Asian region, and all regions within our IPv6 circumference.           

        Lets make 2006 the year of wide IPv6 ready production deployment and in

        the home too.            

	Thank You for your support and esp. to the engineers/architects 
	inventing transition mechanisms and keep them coming, 
	/jim
New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : 12/01/06 EST